• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

About Corrosion

All about corrosion science and engineering

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • Sections
    • Fundamentals
      • HowTos
      • Electrochemistry
      • Thermodynamics
      • Kinetics
      • Localized corrosion
      • Stress corrosion cracking
      • Cathodic protection
      • Carbon dioxide
    • Physical Metallurgy
    • Low alloy steels
    • Corrosion Resistant Alloys
      • Stainless steels
      • Nickel Alloys
  • Library
    • Lectures
    • Journal Articles
    • Conference Papers
    • Presentations
    • Abstracts
    • Definitions
    • Equations
    • Standards
    • Videos
    • Tables
  • Ref Convert
  • OpenLab!

Sulfide stress cracking of nickel-containing low-alloy steels

September 29, 2014 by Mariano Iannuzzi

Link to Corrigendum.

Together with my colleagues and good friends Dr. Mariano A. Kappes, Prof. Ricardo Carranza, and Dr. Raúl B. Rebak, we recently published a review paper on the effect of nickel on hydrogen embrittlement and sulfide stress cracking of low alloy steels. We published this article under an OpenAccess license.

The manuscript can be downloaded following this link or directly from the publisher’s website.

Citation Information

Corrosion Reviews. Volume 32, Issue 3-4, Pages 101–128, ISSN (Online) 2191-0316, ISSN (Print) 0334-6005, doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2014-0027, September 2014.

For more information please contact me.

Abstract

Low-alloy steels (LAS) are extensively used in oil and gas production due to their good mechanical properties and low cost. Even though nickel improves mechanical properties and hardenability with low penalty on weldability, which is critical for large subsea components, nickel content cannot exceed 1-wt% when used in sour service applications. The ISO 15156-2 standard limits the nickel content in LAS on the assumption that nickel concentrations above 1-wt% negatively impact sulfide stress cracking (SSC) resistance. This restriction excludes a significant number of high-strength and high-toughness alloys, such as Ni-Cr-Mo (e.g., UNS G43200 and G43400), Ni-Mo (e.g., UNS G46200), and Ni-Cr-Mo-V grades, from sour service applications and can be used only if successfully qualified. However, the standard is based on controversial research conducted more than 40 years ago. Since then, researchers have suggested that it is the microstructure that determines SSC resistance, regardless of Ni content. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of nickel-containing LAS in terms of strength, weldability, hardenability, potential weight savings, and cost reduction. Likewise, the state of knowledge on the effect of nickel on hydrogen absorption as well as SSC initiation and propagation kinetics is critically reviewed.

Corrosion Reviews 32, 101-128, doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2014-0027 (2014)
Corrosion Reviews 32, 101-128, doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2014-0027 (2014)


[altmetric doi=”10.1515/corrrev-2014-0027″ type=”donut” condensed=”true” data-hide-no-mentions=”false” popover=”right” details=”right”]

Update 5 February, 2017

Added Altmetric badge

Update June 30, 2015

Fixed broken link. The Figure now links to the full PDF file.

Filed Under: Journal Articles, Sulfide Stress Cracking Tagged With: corrosion-reviews, hydrogen, hydrogen embrittlement, Hydrogen Stress Cracking, journal-articles, nickel alloy steels, Oil&Gas, ssc

Professor | Director Curtin Corrosion Centre
Chevron & Woodside Chair in Corrosion | Curtin University
Adjunct Professor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

  • About
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Ref Convert

Copyright © 2022 · Mariano Iannuzzi · WordPress · Log in